Driving in the Slow Lane

nature, Outdoors, outside

Last year, I wrote my culminating junior year research paper on The Slow Movement. Although it sounds weird, the slow movement came about in an effort to fight our shortcut-taking, stressed society. I often feel as though we as people, and as a society, are always trying to take on more and work faster, resulting in a constant, inhuman hurry from one thing to the next. In a lot of ways and facets of our lives, I think we’ve become slaves to efficiency, believing faster is better, rather than realizing better often comes from slower. As the actress, Lily Tomlin addresses the issue, “The problem​ with the rat race is that even if you win, you’re still a rat.” So the idea of slowness is to avoid being swept away into the race, unable to stop and rest. It’s the idea that we need to re-balance our lives and priorities between work, hobbies, and friends.

Yet, even after I researched and interviewed a leader of the movement, ultimately making small mindful alterations to my day to counteract “fast,” I often feel the balance shifting. Recently, I think back on the days before leaving for this trip. They were the last academic days of my high school career, and I was becoming possessed by all my assignments and tests. The day before I was scheduled to leave, my friends and I had made plans to go out for dinner one last time; however, I ended up cancelling to stay home and study for a test the next day. Now as I look back, I not only regret taking that extra two hours of studying, but more importantly realize how strong the urge to become machine-like is in my world. It’s not as if “slow” is refusing to do things efficiency, or not doing work at all. It’s simply understanding that not everything should be done quickly, and that life and work are better when you’re not in a constant sprint. In fact, I love this cute video from the philosopher, Alan Watt, because I think it captures how a fast lifestyle is imprinted on us from a young age.

Music and Life- Alan Watts

But it is in the past week of climbing with Zach that prompted me to write this post. In fact, as I read over some of my old notes for my paper, my epigraph seems absolutely fitting for how I feel: “People are born and married, and live and die, in the midst of an uproar so frantic that you would think they would go mad of it.” -William Dean Howells

Wednesday, Zach and I climbed to the top of Devil’s Tower via the classic Durrance route. However, because it’s a classic we quickly found ourselves stuck behind another party, forcing us to wait.

DCIM100GOPROGOPR0185.JPG

Finally getting some shade.

We were both irritated and dehydrated, wishing​ to simply pass them, rip to the top, and get down. But, once Zach finally was able to start leading the next pitch, a skinny, old man, leading the party behind us, came over and introduced himself as Frank.

We chatted for a while as I belayed Zach, and I knew he was a character when someone in his party asked him how he was doing, and he gleefully yelled back, “64 years, 5 months, and 3 days have brought my life right here, and I couldn’t be happier!” He was full of funny banter about the tower and climbing, and when I asked him how many times he’d been to the top, he smiled and insisted, “Not enough!”. It was then that I realized how “fast” had infiltrated even climbing for me. Here I was on an American climbing classic, during a beautiful day in Wyoming, with the sun shining, blue skies, and no where else to be, and yet I was still frustrated with our slow pace while Frank was loving every moment of it.

IMG_20170504_132209.jpg

Frank when I asked if I could take a picture with him.

By the time I got climbing and I met back up with Zach, he informed me that Frank, was Frank Sanders the most legendary climber when it comes to Devil’s Tower. Frank has climbed the tower literally thousands of times– even including a year where he climbed it 365 times in 365 days. It seems to me that if there’s anything Frank loves in life it’s that tower and enjoying climbing it. Even though he’d gone up that route uncountable times, what he said to me as Zach climbed ahead again, stuck: “The speed records already been set, I’m just here to enjoy the day.”


So although I might find myself getting caught up in the vicious cycle of efficiency time and time again, I think it’s important to recognize and have reminders to slow down. Even with that slip up, this trip has made me recognize how my change in lifestyle has eliminated the stresses that worked there way into my regular day. From driving in a rush to school, to driving in the slow lane now, or forgetting to eat because of work, to making meals with my brothers: life’s different now, it’s slower, but it’s definitely better.

DCIM100GOPROGOPR0183.JPG

Zach rapping at the end of the day. 

The Times They Are A Changin’

nature, Outdoors, outside

So it’s been a week since I’ve last blogged, and in that time 27 National Monuments have been put under Interior Department review in accordance with President Trump’s executive order. So what does this mean? Well to begin, national monuments are created when congress or the president (by executive order) deem a specific area/statue/land mass culturally, historically, or scientifically significant under the Antiquities Act of 1906.  Sec. 2 of the Act states:

“That the President of the United States is hereby authorized, in his discretion, to declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States to be national monuments, and may reserve as a part thereof parcels of land, the limits of which in all cases shall be confined to the smallest area compatible with proper care and management of the objects to be protected: Provided, That when such objects are situated upon a tract covered by a bona fied unperfected claim or held in private ownership, the tract, or so much thereof as may be necessary for the proper care and management of the object, may be relinquished to the Government, and the Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized to accept the relinquishment of such tracts in behalf of the Government of the United States.”

Therefore, the act can lead to a lot of subjectivity, and what Trump has called for is a review, by the Secretary of the Interior, of 27 monuments, something called for in Sec. 3 of the Act. What is really interesting though, it that both Trump and the Secretary of the Interior, Ryan Zinke, have called for the first ever formal public comment period on the subject of our national monuments. Zinke commented,

“The Department of the Interior is the steward of America’s greatest treasures and the manager of one-fifth of our land. Part of being a good steward is being a good neighbor and listening to the American people who we represent. Today’s action, initiating a formal public comment process finally gives a voice to local communities and states when it comes to Antiquities Act monument designations. There is no pre-determined outcome on any monument. I look forward to hearing from and engaging with local communities and stakeholders as this process continues.”

IMG_0412.JPG

A Buffalo right outside Devil’s Tower National Monument.

I thought this was an exceptionally interesting move, as of course with anything, valid arguments are coming from both sides of the spectrum. While some believe that land is better managed by the state and the people who live on it (rather than distance Washington), others fear the loss of cultural connections to the lands as access and care for it degrade. There are certainly arguments to be had on both sides.

My thoughts are churning though as I sit in a hotel in Gillette, Wyoming after the first shower of a couple weeks. Although, you’ve probably never heard of it, Gillette is the Energy Capital of the Nation providing 40% of the nation’s coal according to the city’s website.

about

Photo from www.visitgillettewright.com of the open pit coal mines of Gillette

After speaking with some of the locals, my Dad, who is visiting for two days before we go to Idaho, was discussing how with Trump’s support of the coal industry, Gillette is on the up and up, after Obama’s push for solar and sustainable energy degraded their economy. It just reminded me how every move in politics is a double edged sword: every good event also marks a bad one.

Zach and I walked around an “Energy Park” in Gillette where retired coal and oil machinery come to die.

A huge, retired coal scoop.

I believe the same is true with the National Monument review. In a lot ways, giving land management to the people who live there creates a healthier economy, and allows knowledgeable people to care for the land rather than unattached feds.  A good example of this is Utah, which is a hotbed for these issues because 65% of Utah is already federally owned. Therefore, the state has reason to feel a lack of control and local decision making over the land, and how it should be cared for. It’s not as if people in Utah don’t value the cultural aspects of the land, but there is distrust and dislike of a distant president simply declaring something without their full input.  On the the other hand, the cultural value of certain areas needs to be preserved and kept pristine. In the case of Bear Ears National Monument in Utah, Obama created it after a proposal by “The Bear Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition,” a group of five Native American tribes whose culture and ancestry find the actual “Bear Ears” and the surrounding land sacred.

The “Bear Ears” for which the monument is named (Photo www.canyoncountryzephyr.com). The total monument is 1.9 million acres.

Moreover, the land contains several archaeological and historic sites, while also being a place well-loved by outdoor enthusiasts who fear that if it isn’t protected, economic interests could alter the landscape and eliminate access. But the Antiquities Act is not suppose to be simply a land management tool for the federal government. As it states it is for preserving historic, prehistoric, or scientific places, while taking the smallest amount of land needed to preserve those areas.

So what do you think? It actually matters this time because Zinke and Trump want to know what you think about the Act, its use, its function, and the monuments it protects. I encourage you to research more and weigh in on the subject because this is your land. From the US Department of the Interior, “Comments may be submitted online after May 12 http://www.regulations.gov by entering “DOI-2017-0002” in the Search bar and clicking “Search,” or by mail to Monument Review, MS-1530, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240.”

Below are the sources I used and they can be used as your starting point.  But I will leave you with this:

“The penalty good people pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by people worse than themselves”- Plato

Interior Department Releases List of Monuments Under Review, Announces First-Ever Formal Public Comment Period for Antiquities Act Monuments

American Antiquities Act of 1906

27 national monuments under Interior Dept. review

Keeping the President’s Hands Off Utah’s Land

Why Oppose the Bears Ears National Monument?

Navajos, Utah Officials Oppose Designation of Bears Ears as National Monument

Bear Ears Coalition Proposal